SEIU to Back NY Senate Republican Caucus

SEIU 1199, the New York-based local closely associated with Int'l Pres. Andy Stern, has decided to put their muscle behind Republican NY Senate President Joe Bruno and his Republican caucus, and apparently committed to working to ensure that Democrats do not regain control of the chamber.  The Albany Times Union reports:

The union will provide resources exclusively to the GOP this fall, the person said.  Union leaders, joined by key health care industry figures, met Friday with Sen. Bruno to discuss how to help the GOP hold control.

The Reps hold the Senate in this blue state by a 32-30 margin, which is very bad news for a wide range of progressive causes, especially healthcare.  This SEIU-Repbulican deal is instructive for those following the debate within the labor movement between Andy Stern's SEIU and the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee, much of which turns on the political profiles of the unions and on CNA/NNOC's work towards guaranteed healthcare.  

CNA/NNOC, like most RNs, is committed heart and soul to ending the healthcare crisis with the kind of "Medicare for All," or single-payer systems working in nearly every other industrialized democracy.  This means we have had to battle not just Republicans, but also Andy Stern's SEIU both at the national level and in state after state.  Stern has explicitly rejected single-payer an unfeasible, and worked to extend the customers and profits of private insurance corporations.  

In California, CNA/NNOC led the campaign to defeat a Schwarzenegger-SEIU healthcare bill that would have given billions in new public subsidies to the insurance corporations.  The bill was supported by 9 of the state's 10 largest insurance corporations along with SEIU--but opposed by most of labor and the state's healthcare/consumer reformers.

In New York, a single-payer bill has been already passed the Assembly, but has been blocked by Republicans who control the state Senate.  SEIU's strategy here seems to be to sell out wide-reaching healthcare reform in return for some raising more money for their corporate partners in the hospital and healthcare industry, so it can trickle down to patients and workers.

For a little more background on Bruno and the Senate Republicans, you can check out this Village Voice piece.  This comment from SEIU on Bruno is instructive: "Senator Bruno's commitment to protecting quality care for all New Yorkers has made him a tremendous ally to the entire healthcare community. The Senate majority's advocacy on behalf of caregivers has been second to none. We have the deepest respect for Senator Bruno's leadership and we will continue to work with him to ensure that New York State maintains world class healthcare for all."  Note the words...Bruno protects New York's world class healthcare for all; in other words, there's no healthcare crisis, so it's okay to keep Republicans in power.

SEIU's support of the Senate Republicans is happening just as they begin an unprecedented 30-hospital raid of the venerable New York State Nurses' Association, which was actually the nation's first professional RN, and has a strong track record of supporting RN patient advocacy.  For those keeping track, that means that Andy Stern's SEIU is currently engaged in large-scale efforts to bust three major unions--with hundreds of organizers in California attempting to take over CNA/NNOC as well as dissident SEIU local United Healthcare Workers-West, along with the coordinated NYSNA raids.

Brought to you by the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee--America's RN Union.



Display:


Re: SEIU to Back NY Senate Republican Caucus (none / 0)

That is quite surprising.

I have trouble understanding the rartionale for that move.


by TomP on Mon May 05, 2008 at 04:43:51 PM EST

Re: SEIU to Back NY Senate Republican Caucus (2.00 / 1)

Its not entirely new.  1199 endorsed Pataki in his third term as part of deal that they argue is beneficial to their membership.

It is incredibly short-sighted (IMHO) and deserves as much criticism as possible.

However, to say this is SEIU is stretching it.  32BJ is much closer to the international and they flipped out (and did not endorse Pataki) when this originally happened.  As I write below, 32BJ is much closer.  Dennis Rivera (President of 1199) is seen more as a maverick, while Mike Fishman (President of 32BJ) was orignally put in office by the international when it was put into trusteeship as a result of Gus Bevona's corruption.


by labor nrrd on Mon May 05, 2008 at 04:59:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Good point mixed with intellectual dishonesty (2.00 / 1)

Hey something I agree with you about, 1199's efforts to support Republicans in NY have always been shortsighted to me....

But the venerable New York State Nurses Association... They might be great, but if you want to compare histories, 1199 has an amazing history (which makes this stance more upsetting).  Upheavel in the Quiet Zone gives a great history of this union, whose strike in 1959 (anniversary is this thursday) won the right for healthcare workers to organize, was supported by both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King (who called it his favourite union) and kept the civil rights coalition together into the 80s.

But for intellectual dishonesty, it is not SEIU that is supporting the Republicans but a local in SEIU.  You say 1199 is a close ally, but Dennis Rivera is actually known as a maverick.  The NY SEIU Local that is actually very close to the international is 32BJ (The building service union... doormen, janitors, etc...) as that local was put into trusteeship and current president had been selected by the international (before being elected) and they were furious when 1199 first made its deal with Pataki.

People critize SEIU for being undemocratic, but then you would want them to stop 1199 implementing their own political program .. or blame them for it?


by labor nrrd on Mon May 05, 2008 at 04:50:34 PM EST

Re: Good point mixed with intellectual dishonesty (none / 0)

Well, first of all, let's not start equating disagreement with intellectual dishonesty.

Second of all, Rivera is known as Stern's closest ally within SEIU, and in fact has been promoted from UHW-E to head the new SEIU healthcare division, whatever it's called...

I'll agree that both NYSNA and SEIU/1199 have great histories, but we need to focus on the present-day.  I've always heard that single-payer supporters in New York state had issues with 1199, I think this makes clear why.  Did now know about the Pataki connection...


Join the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee to fight for guaranteed, single-payer healthcare: www.GuaranteedHealthcare.org/blog
by California Nurses Shum on Mon May 05, 2008 at 06:35:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Okay, I am reading this and trying to (none / 0)

understand,  But I am too disgusted.
I am a fan of SEIU because I know then as a very tough and aggressive union.  But they love to go with who they think is the winner and sometimes they just chose wrong.  I wonder if this is the case in their choice in NY.
For Obama it now becomes: Faith, hope and CHANGE! And the greatest of these is Change!
by TeresaInPa on Mon May 05, 2008 at 05:14:07 PM EST

Re: Okay, I am reading this and trying to (2.00 / 1)

I think this is labor movement disease.  Too many unions just want to pick the right side, rather than push for their preferred candidate (because that might show weakness)

I think SEIU is somewhat better in this regard, but only by 10 percent or so.

This 1199 alliance with State Republicans go along way back.  Other SEIU locals in NY do not go the same way.


by labor nrrd on Mon May 05, 2008 at 05:24:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Okay, I am reading this and trying to (2.00 / 1)

I am still somewhat bitter that they didn't endorse Edwards early on in the nomination process - who was the favourite throughout the union.  But the locals in New York and Illinois fought this off.

I admire AFSCME for backing Clinton early on (even if I don't like their choice, I think endorsing early and pushing for your candidate is better than trying to wait and see how it will play out)


by labor nrrd on Mon May 05, 2008 at 05:27:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Okay, I am reading this and trying to (none / 0)

I agree with you on Edwards, but it was not just SEIU.  Most of CtW other than the Carpenters failed to support the strongest union candidate.  Some state SEIU locals went with Edwards and some Unite Here.  But SEIU, the Teamsters, Unite Here, and the Foodworkers could have made a diffference.  Have they changed to win enough?  


by TomP on Mon May 05, 2008 at 05:53:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I remember that that stuck with Dean (none / 0)

even after he lost IA and I admired that.  I know people from 1199, I worked with them for ACT in 2004.  I do not think that the lower level organizers are with Stern on this but I could be wrong.
On the other hand the state democratic party in NY doesn't have that great a rep either.
For Obama it now becomes: Faith, hope and CHANGE! And the greatest of these is Change!
by TeresaInPa on Tue May 06, 2008 at 07:15:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: SEIU to Back NY Senate Republican Caucus (1.00 / 1)

Is this the same SEIU that has endorsed Obama?  


Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Mon May 05, 2008 at 06:23:03 PM EST

Is this the same CNA that endorsed Nader? (none / 0)


by Nate1212 on Tue May 06, 2008 at 07:22:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.